On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 03:15:43PM +0100, Robert Bragg wrote: > I've changed the uapi for configuring the i915_oa specific attributes > when calling perf_event_open(2) whereby instead of cramming lots of > bitfields into the perf_event_attr config members, I'm now > daisy-chaining a drm_i915_oa_event_attr_t structure off of a single > config member that's extensible and validated in the same way as the > perf_event_attr struct. I've found this much nicer to work with while > being neatly extensible too. This worries me a bit.. is there more background for this? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
