On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 10:52 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 07 May 2015 09:39:18 Paul Bolle wrote: > I realize the downsides of not posting the entire series at once > here, but it seemed better to avoid spamming everyone too much, > while I try to find out if we have agreement on the overall > strategy. That downside is worse when people only quickly skim your message for clues while thinking about the problem they _think_ they've spotted (like I did). > For reference, see below for the ARM patch. > > And then it occurred to me to check the y2038-syscalls git branch you > > referenced. After which the above made much more sense. (Though my > > remark that ARCH_HAS_COMPAT_TIME simply functions as an alias for COMPAT > > also seems to hold for that branch.) > > Right, in fact both of these happen at the end of the git tree. Still, you might consider making ARCH_HAS_COMPAT_TIME a plain bool and adding "select ARCH_HAS_COMPAT_TIME" to the eight or so COMPAT entries. But, clearly, I'm now wasting even more of your time by trying to save face here. Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
