Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The requirements for auditing of containers should be derived from VPP. In it, > it asks for selectable auditing, selective audit, and selective audit review. > What this means is that we need the container and all its children to have one > identifier that is inserted into all the events that are associated with the > container. That is technically impossible. Nested containers exist. That is when container G is nested in container F which is in turn nested in container E which is in turn nested in container D which is in turn nested in container C which is in turn nested in container B which is nested in container A there is no one label you can put on audit messages from container G which is the ``correct'' one. Or are you proposing that something in container G have labels A B C D E F G included on every audit message? That introduces enough complexity in generating and parsing the messages I wouldn't trust those messages as the least bug in generation and parsing would be a security issue. What is the world is VPP? It sounds like something non-public thing. Certainly it has never been a part of the public container discussion and as such it appears to be completely ridiculous to bring up in a public discussion. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
