On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:37:51AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 03/31/2015 10:24 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > > On 3/31/15, 8:32 AM, "Shuah Khan" <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Hi Daren, > >> > >> On 03/27/2015 04:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > >>> Hi Shuah, > >>> > >>> This series begins the process of migrating my futextest tests into > >>> kselftest. > >>> I've started with only the functional tests, as the performance and > >>> stress may > >>> not be appropriate for kselftest as they stand. > >>> > >>> I cleaned up various complaints from checkpatch, but I ignored others > >>> that would > >>> require significant rework of the testcases, such as not using volatile > >>> and not > >>> creating new typedefs. > >>> > >>> The patches will follow, but I'm providing a pull request for your > >>> convenience > >>> as well. > >> > >> Thanks for acting on this so quickly after we talked about it at ELC. > >> Just a quick note that I am going to get to this soon once I get the > >> 4.1 content wrapped up. We can plan upon getting these into 4.2. > > > > OK. Michael E. provided some feedback which I can either incorporate and > > respin, or I can send as a follow-on to your -next after you merge these. > > Which do you prefer? > > ... > You can wait to re-do patches. I am planning to review the > patch set later on this week. That way you can avoid re-spin > just in case, I have other comments. Hi Shuah, Did you have any additional comments for the futex tests? Thanks, -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
