On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > >> Sorry, something about that patch-patch didn't make sense to me, but I >> need to look more closely. My objection was that you were able to get the >> pA capabilities into pP without them being in your pI. Your proposed >> change didn't seem like it would fix that. > > Just tried to fix that. Could it be that cap_inherited is never set even > for a binary that has > > christoph@fujitsu-haswell:~$ getcap ambient_test > > ambient_test = cap_setpcap,cap_net_admin,cap_net_raw,cap_sys_nice+eip I think that's right. fI doesn't set pI. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
