On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 16:19 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 02:16:05PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > > On 02/09/2015 05:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 17:36 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > >> On 02/09/2015 05:30 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > >>> On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 11:36 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > >>>> Hi Linus, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Please pull the following Kselftest updates for 3.20-rc1 > > > >>>> > > > >>>> thanks, > > > >>>> -- Shuah > > > >>>> > > > >>> ... > > > >>> > > > >>> I don't understand why you insist on merging this series with the logic copied > > > >>> 18 times. > > > >>> > > > >>> I'm happy to tweak my series that uses an include file, but I don't see the > > > >>> point of merging this series first when almost every line will be removed when > > > >>> my series goes in. > > > >> > > > >> Please work on the suggestions I made and rework the patches > > > >> and resend. As I mentioned earlier, I want to enable this work > > > >> and them make improvements. > > > > > > > > Yes I would like install to work to. I'd also like it to work for the powerpc > > > > tests you ignored. But I don't want it to involve copying the same logic into > > > > every Makefile in the tree. > > > > > > > My series was sent over a month ago, with plenty of time for you to merge it > > > > instead of this cut-and-paste solution. > > > > > > I asked you to re-work the patches based on my suggestions > > > and resend. I didn't see any patches from you that addressed > > > the comments. I can't merge the patches you sent without > > > addressing the comments. > > > > Your comments were "please rebase on my series", and as I explained that is > > pointless because my series replaces your series. > > Michael's series also has a bunch of features this pull doesn't. > I had started implementing some of these features myself before realizing > this stuff was in limbo. (Especially the ability to install to a > different directory: our use case involves packaging up the latest > selftests for use to be run against a long-term stable kernel). > > What needs to happen to unblock this, given that nothing has been > merged so far. > > Working on selftests is sort of frustrating with all this stuff pending > given the potential conflicts. Thanks for chiming in Dave, and sorry that this has gotten into such a mess. I'll post a rebased version of my series and we can discuss the merits of each approach. cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
