On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:27:15AM -0800, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 10:19AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > What needs to happen (IMHO) is to make gpio_chips properly obeying > > the device model, and then add the attributes for fiddling around with > > GPIOs to either the *real* device or create a new char device interface. > > Whatever works best. These mock devices are fragile and never > > worked properly especially in the removal path as Johans recent > > fixes has shown. > > Sure, that would be a nice long-term solution. But until then this patch > would probably be welcomed by some people, without making the brokenness > of this interface much worse. We don't knowingly add broken functionality, and especially not when it will become ABI that needs to be maintained forever. And "this might be useful for someone at some point" is certainly not a reason to break that rule. Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
