On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 08:32 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 02/03/2015 12:58 AM, David Drysdale wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On systems which don't implement sys_execveat(), this test produces a > >> lot of output. > >> > >> Add a check at the beginning to see if the syscall is present, and if > >> not just note one error and return. > >> > >> When we run on a system that doesn't implement the syscall we will get > >> ENOSYS back from the kernel, so change the logic that handles > >> __NR_execveat not being defined to also use ENOSYS rather than -ENOSYS. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: David Drysdale <drysdale@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks Michael, and David. I will queue this for 3.20 Thanks. cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
