On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 10:03 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 06:57:22PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > + /* TPM 1.2 requires self-test on resume. */
> > > > + if (!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)) {
> > > > + ret = tpm_do_selftest(chip);
> > > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > > + return ret;
> > >
> > > Just to note, the return value from tpm_do_selftest() on TPM 1.2 chips was
> > > previously ignored. Mine does return 0.
> >
> > Right. I can update the patch to ignore return value if the majority
> > wants that.
>
> What happens to the system when pnp_driver.resume() returns failure?
>
> Should tpm ever report failure on resume to the rest of the kernel?
>
> Shouldn't this stuff be in tpm_pm_resume common code anyhow?
I think it should but not in the scope of this bug fix IMHO.
> Jason
/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
