On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 17:29 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Amir Vadai <amirv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 15:56:33 +0200
>
> > Mellanox is about to release next month a driver for a new NIC, with 3
> > new speeds * few link modes for each + new link modes for 10G.
> > It seems that we will need to consume almost all the new bits.
>
> This tells me that the approach to this problem needs to be rethought.
>
> Maybe we just need to bite the bullet and make a new ETHTOOL_GSET_2
> and ETHTOOL_SSET_2 or whatever you want to name them.
>
> Then we can define a completely new structure, with 64-bit bitmaps
> for link modes or whatever. The ethtool_op callbacks work using
> this structure, and only the net/core/ethtool.c code knows about
> the older structure and translates to/from for ETHTOOL_{GSET,SSET}.
Agreed.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
This sentence contradicts itself - no actually it doesn't.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
