Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> writes: > Am 05.01.2015 um 23:48 schrieb Aditya Kali: >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> Aditya, >>> >>> I gave your patch set a try but it does not work for me. >>> Maybe you can bring some light into the issues I'm facing. >>> Sadly I still had no time to dig into your code. >>> >>> Am 05.12.2014 um 02:55 schrieb Aditya Kali: >>>> Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <adityakali@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/cgroups/namespace.txt | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 147 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/cgroups/namespace.txt >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/namespace.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/namespace.txt >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 0000000..6480379 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/namespace.txt >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ >>>> + CGroup Namespaces >>>> + >>>> +CGroup Namespace provides a mechanism to virtualize the view of the >>>> +/proc/<pid>/cgroup file. The CLONE_NEWCGROUP clone-flag can be used with >>>> +clone() and unshare() syscalls to create a new cgroup namespace. >>>> +The process running inside the cgroup namespace will have its /proc/<pid>/cgroup >>>> +output restricted to cgroupns-root. cgroupns-root is the cgroup of the process >>>> +at the time of creation of the cgroup namespace. >>>> + >>>> +Prior to CGroup Namespace, the /proc/<pid>/cgroup file used to show complete >>>> +path of the cgroup of a process. In a container setup (where a set of cgroups >>>> +and namespaces are intended to isolate processes), the /proc/<pid>/cgroup file >>>> +may leak potential system level information to the isolated processes. >>>> + >>>> +For Example: >>>> + $ cat /proc/self/cgroup >>>> + 0:cpuset,cpu,cpuacct,memory,devices,freezer,hugetlb:/batchjobs/container_id1 >>>> + >>>> +The path '/batchjobs/container_id1' can generally be considered as system-data >>>> +and its desirable to not expose it to the isolated process. >>>> + >>>> +CGroup Namespaces can be used to restrict visibility of this path. >>>> +For Example: >>>> + # Before creating cgroup namespace >>>> + $ ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup >>>> + lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:37 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835] >>>> + $ cat /proc/self/cgroup >>>> + 0:cpuset,cpu,cpuacct,memory,devices,freezer,hugetlb:/batchjobs/container_id1 >>>> + >>>> + # unshare(CLONE_NEWCGROUP) and exec /bin/bash >>>> + $ ~/unshare -c >>>> + [ns]$ ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup >>>> + lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:35 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532183] >>>> + # From within new cgroupns, process sees that its in the root cgroup >>>> + [ns]$ cat /proc/self/cgroup >>>> + 0:cpuset,cpu,cpuacct,memory,devices,freezer,hugetlb:/ >>>> + >>>> + # From global cgroupns: >>>> + $ cat /proc/<pid>/cgroup >>>> + 0:cpuset,cpu,cpuacct,memory,devices,freezer,hugetlb:/batchjobs/container_id1 >>>> + >>>> + # Unshare cgroupns along with userns and mountns >>>> + # Following calls unshare(CLONE_NEWCGROUP|CLONE_NEWUSER|CLONE_NEWNS), then >>>> + # sets up uid/gid map and execs /bin/bash >>>> + $ ~/unshare -c -u -m >>> >>> This command does not issue CLONE_NEWUSER, -U does. >>> >> I was using a custom unshare binary. But I will update the command >> line to be similar to the one in util-linux. >> >>>> + # Originally, we were in /batchjobs/container_id1 cgroup. Mount our own cgroup >>>> + # hierarchy. >>>> + [ns]$ mount -t cgroup cgroup /tmp/cgroup >>>> + [ns]$ ls -l /tmp/cgroup >>>> + total 0 >>>> + -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2014-10-13 09:32 cgroup.controllers >>>> + -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 2014-10-13 09:32 cgroup.populated >>>> + -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2014-10-13 09:25 cgroup.procs >>>> + -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2014-10-13 09:32 cgroup.subtree_control >>> >>> I've patched libvirt-lxc to issue CLONE_NEWCGROUP and not bind mount cgroupfs into a container. >>> But I'm unable to mount cgroupfs within the container, mount(2) is failing with EINVAL. >>> And /proc/self/cgroup still shows the cgroup from outside. >>> >>> ---cut--- >>> container:/ # ls /sys/fs/cgroup/ >>> container:/ # mount -t cgroup none /sys/fs/cgroup/ >> >> You need to provide "-o __DEVEL_sane_behavior" flag. Inside the >> container, only unified hierarchy can be mounted. So, for now, that >> flag is needed. I will fix the documentation too. >> >>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on none, >>> missing codepage or helper program, or other error >>> >>> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try >>> dmesg | tail or so. >>> container:/ # cat /proc/self/cgroup >>> 8:memory:/machine/test00.libvirt-lxc >>> 7:devices:/machine/test00.libvirt-lxc >>> 6:hugetlb:/ >>> 5:cpuset:/machine/test00.libvirt-lxc >>> 4:blkio:/machine/test00.libvirt-lxc >>> 3:cpu,cpuacct:/machine/test00.libvirt-lxc >>> 2:freezer:/machine/test00.libvirt-lxc >>> 1:name=systemd:/user.slice/user-0.slice/session-c2.scope >>> container:/ # ls -la /proc/self/ns >>> total 0 >>> dr-x--x--x 2 root root 0 Dec 14 23:02 . >>> dr-xr-xr-x 8 root root 0 Dec 14 23:02 .. >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:02 cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532240] >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:02 ipc -> ipc:[4026532238] >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:02 mnt -> mnt:[4026532235] >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:02 net -> net:[4026532242] >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:02 pid -> pid:[4026532239] >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:02 user -> user:[4026532234] >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:02 uts -> uts:[4026532236] >>> container:/ # >>> >>> #host side >>> lxc-os132:~ # ls -la /proc/self/ns >>> total 0 >>> dr-x--x--x 2 root root 0 Dec 14 23:56 . >>> dr-xr-xr-x 8 root root 0 Dec 14 23:56 .. >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:56 cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835] >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:56 ipc -> ipc:[4026531839] >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:56 mnt -> mnt:[4026531840] >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:56 net -> net:[4026531957] >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:56 pid -> pid:[4026531836] >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:56 user -> user:[4026531837] >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 14 23:56 uts -> uts:[4026531838] >>> ---cut--- >>> >>> Any ideas? >>> >> >> Please try with "-o __DEVEL_sane_behavior" flag to the mount command. > > Ohh, this renders the whole patch useless for me as systemd needs the "old/default" behavior of cgroups. :-( > I really hoped that cgroup namespaces will help me running systemd in a sane way within Linux containers. Ugh. It sounds like there is a real mess here. At the very least there is misunderstanding. I have a memory that systemd should have been able to use a unified hierarchy. As you could still mount the different controllers independently (they just use the same directory structure on each mount). That said from a practical standpoint I am not certain that a cgroup namespace is viable if it can not support the behavior of cgroupsfs that everyone is using. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
