On 12/12/2014 02:46 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
Detect TPM 2.0 by sending idempotent TPM 2.x command. Ordinals for
TPM 2.0 are higher than TPM 1.x commands so this should be fail-safe.
Using STS3 is unreliable because some chips just report 0xff and not
what the spec says.
TPM TIS 1.2 can report either 0xff or 0x00 for sts3 since that part of
register was not defined for this version but only for a later version.
So, unless the TIS 1.3 for TPM 2.0 is broken, it should report a bit
_pattern_ (not plain 0x00 or 0xff) that you could apply the suggested
mask to and check then.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
