On 14/12/10, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 21:11 -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 09, 2014 03:37:07 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > > Since both ppc and ppc64 have LE variants which are now reported by uname, > > > add that flag (__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) to syscall_get_arch() and add > > > AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64LE variant. > > > > > > Without this, perf trace and auditctl fail. > > > > > > Mainline kernel reports ppc64le (per a058801) but there is no matching > > > AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64LE. > > > > > > Since 32-bit PPC LE is not supported by audit, don't advertise it in > > > AUDIT_ARCH_PPC* variants. > > > > > > See: > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-August/msg00082.html > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-December/msg00004.html > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h | 6 +++++- > > > include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 ++ > > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > The audit changes look fine to me, but as I mentioned earlier, this should go > > in via the ppc tree and not the audit tree. > > > > Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks. > > Yep I'll take it via the powerpc tree, I'll CC stable as well as presumably we > want this to work in all versions that had LE support. Yes, please! (I was very tempted to change the #error to #warning, but figured the placeholder comment in the uapi file was sufficient.) > cheers - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@xxxxxxxxxx> Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
