Re: [PATCH net-next] net: introduce SO_INCOMING_CPU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 15:03 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> If the kernel had an API for this, I'd be all for using it.
>
> It would be user land code, not kernel.
>
> Why doing a system call when you can avoid it ? ;)
>
> Doing it in the kernel would be quite complex actually.

A semi-official library would work, too.  As long as it kept working.

>
> In userland, you can even implement this by machine learning.
>
> For every connection you made, you get the 4-tuple and INCOMING_CPU,
> then you store it in a cache.

Eww :(

>
> Next time you need to connect to same remote peer, you can lookup in the
> cache to find a good candidate.
>
> It would actually be good if we could do in a single socket verb a
> bind_and_connect(fd, &source, &destination)

Fair enough.  Although for my use case, the time it takes to connect
is completely irrelevant.

--Andy

>
>



-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux