Re: [PATCH v8] kernel, add panic_on_warn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/06/2014 05:07 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 01:57:36PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> 
> [..]
>> You see that doing
>>
>> 	if (panic_on_warn) {
>> 		panic_on_warn = 0;
>> 		panic(...);
>> 	}
>>
>> is racy, I hope.  If two threads WARN() at the same time, then there's 
>> nothing preventing a double panic() because WARN() itself is not 
>> serialized against anything.  So both the current comment and your 
>> suggested revision comment are bogus.
> 
> panic() is serialized on panic_lock. So I guess it is fine to hit WARN()
> on multiple cpus. Do you see an issue there?

Oops -- didn't see this until just now.

Once again, Vivek beat me to the punch :) and much more succinctly than I will
ever be able to do. :)

P.

> 
> Thanks
> Vivek
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux