On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 03:25:27PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> Very good idea, should have came up with it myself :-)
>
> Does __setup("perf_use_local_clock") sound reasonable?
Would not the 'module' already prefix a perf.? I never quite know how
all that works out. But sure, that works.
> Then we have to
> decide whether to hide the sysctl "perf_sample_time_clk_id" (my
> preferred option, will see how difficult it is) or just provide an
> invalid clock_id (eg. -1) in it.
invalid clock id is fine with me, although I suppose the clock people
might have an oh-pinion ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
