On 2014-10-30 00:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > There is a 1815 line documentation file in this series, so we aren't > trying to not provide this type of information here at all. But yes, > more background, about why this can't be done in userspace (zero copy, > less context switches, proper credential passing, timestamping, availble > at early-boot, LSM hooks for security models to tie into While you're at it... I have worked on proof-of-concept LSM patches for kdbus some time ago, see [1][2]. Currently, these are completely of date. [1] https://github.com/lmctl/linux/commits/kdbus-lsm-v4.for-systemd-v212 [2] https://github.com/lmctl/kdbus/commit/aa0885489d19be92fa41c6f0a71df28763228a40 May I ask if you guys have your own plan for LSM or maybe it would be worth to resurrect [1]? Cheers, -- Karol Lewandowski, Samsung R&D Institute Poland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
