On 10/30/2014 05:04 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > For what it is worth these patches are also poorly split up. Every > patch I looked at in detail had functions that were being introduced > that did not have callers. Yes, we wanted to keep the reply threading cleaner and the individual patches short. With a patch set that avoids introducing functions without callers, each patch would have grown substantially. But I know that's unusual to do it that way. > That poor split up of the patches makes it difficult to see how > the functionality that is being introduced is being used. Ok, I see. For now, I think it's probably easiest to pull the patches from here, and then look at the resulting files directly: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git/log/?h=kdbus Other than that, please give us some time to respond to your longer reply. Thanks for taking the time to write this up! Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
