Re: [PATCH RFC] introduce ioctl to completely invalidate page cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2014-10-03 03:25, Thanos Makatos wrote:
-		fsync_bdev(bdev);
-		invalidate_bdev(bdev);
+		flush_buffer_cache(bdev);
+		if (BLKFLSBUF2 == cmd)
+			return invalidate_inode_pages2(
+					bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping);
  		return 0;

We're currently ignoring the buffer cache sync and invalidation (which is odd),
but at least being consistent would be good.

Might also need a filemap_write_and_wait() to sync before invalidation.

(I've got zero knowledge in this area, so excuse my ignorance!)

Does filemap_write_and_wait() writes back modified, memory-mapped pages? If so,
isn't there a race condition? Or have I got it completely wrong?

There's no race to be concerned of for this ioctl. Any page dirtied before you make the call will be synced, any page dirtied after may not. This is no different than what would happen on the buffer cache side in the current ioctl.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux