On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/03/2014 05:17 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: >> >> allow user space to generate eBPF programs >> >> uapi/linux/bpf.h: eBPF instruction set definition >> >> linux/filter.h: the rest >> >> This patch only moves macro definitions, but practically it freezes >> existing >> eBPF instruction set, though new instructions can still be added in the >> future. >> >> These eBPF definitions cannot go into uapi/linux/filter.h, since the names >> may conflict with existing applications. >> >> Full eBPF ISA description is in Documentation/networking/filter.txt >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Ok, given you post the remaining two RFCs later on this window as > you indicate, I have no objections: > > Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx> David, I see that all 4 patches are marked as rfc, whereas I tagged only 3 and 4 as 'rfc' and mentioned in cover letter that they will be coming for real in stage III. Here they support patch 2 and show the future changes to bpf.h file. Patches 1 and 2 are good to go. Note that they're on top of Hannes's patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/385266/ Do you want me to resubmit just first two? Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
