> My feeling is that it should be in glibc: as Mike mentioned, we don't normally > change the behavior of existing system calls unless they are obviously > broken to start with. If we want to keep fchmodat getting the implicit > "." directory, and at the same time keep fchmod returning an error, the fchmod > wrapper around fchmodat is the only place that can enforce this. My point was that it's quite arguable that the *at syscall interfaces were broken to begin with. I've never seen anything suggesting their intent was other than to permit relative pathnames, and the empty string has never been a valid relative pathname. To fit the POSIX requirements as I read them, the *at functions must refuse to resolve the empty string. So if the kernel does not change and my interpretation of POSIX stands, then libc must wrap all the *at syscalls with a function that checks for the empty string and fails with ENOENT as a special case. I don't have any strong opinion about this subject, but it makes the most sense to me for the kernel's behavior to change. I know of no reason to think that the current treatment of the empty string was ever intended at the creation of the *at interfaces. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
