On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Richard Cochran wrote: > Recently on the lkml, we discussed how to allow adjustment of posix > clocks. I have tried to understand and implement the ideas expressed > in the various threads. Cc'ing the relevant maintainers to such discussions and patches might be helpful. Seems I need to do some archive digging. > If there is agreement on this approach, I will resubmit these two > patches as part of a longer series, including support for a new kind > of hardware clock, so you can see how it all fits together. But first, > I would like to concentrate on the new syscall itself. > > The patches are against a recent net-next tree. Please don't worry if > the syscall tables are not quite up to date. I can fix that later. How is this related to net-next ? Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
