On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 08:22:40AM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > At this point, I think it is clear that, in order to support IEEE > 1588, some kind of changes are needed. I have argued and discussed the Just to be absolutely clear, I should have said, "hardare clocks for IEEE 1588." The aim of the patch set is to support a new kind of hardware. > Having said that, if you are convinced that the existing interfaces > are good enough to support PTP (and possible future methods, as Again, I meant "PTP hardware clocks." When I get some more time, I'll try to put together an executive summary of PTP and of all the discussions that have taken place over the last few months on linux-netdev and the lkml. Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
