On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:57:26PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > +static inline int common_clock_adj(const clockid_t which_clock, int ppb,
> > + struct timespec *tp)
> > +{
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int no_timer_create(struct k_itimer *new_timer)
> > {
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> So we already return -EOPNOTSUPP in some cases? The man page does not document this.
> I wonder if we should change that to -EINVAL as well.
ENOTTY is the usual errno for "inappropriate ioctl for device". Due to
the way this patch has been chopped up, I can't tell if that's what is
intended here.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
