Hi Peter, On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:30:22 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 12:35 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > In asm-generic/fcntl.h, F_SETOWN_EX and F_GETLK64 both have value 12, and > > F_GETOWN_EX and F_SETLK64 both have value 13. I don't see how this is > > going to work correctly. See > > <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2009-10/msg00013.html>. > > > Ugh,.. yeah, non obvious collision that. This is why we have F_LINUX_SPECIFIC_BASE and use it in include/linux/fcntl.h ... it should be used as a base for any new fcntl types since they don't require backward compatibility. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpqTXreoe79z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
