Hi Willy, On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:01 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 02:30:59PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Though it just occured to me that there are dragons lurking: > > > > arch/alpha/Kconfig: select ARCH_NO_PREEMPT > > arch/hexagon/Kconfig: select ARCH_NO_PREEMPT > > arch/m68k/Kconfig: select ARCH_NO_PREEMPT if !COLDFIRE > > arch/um/Kconfig: select ARCH_NO_PREEMPT > > Sounds like three-and-a-half architectures which could be queued up for > removal right behind ia64 ... > > I suspect none of these architecture maintainers have any idea there's a > problem. Look at commit 87a4c375995e and the discussion in > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180724175646.3621-1-hch@xxxxxx/ > > Let's cc those maintainers so they can remove this and fix whatever > breaks. Looks like your scare tactics are working ;-) [PATCH/RFC] m68k: Add full preempt support https://lore.kernel.org/all/7858a184cda66e0991fd295c711dfed7e4d1248c.1696603287.git.geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
