[PATCH v3 2/6] sh: pci: Do PCI error check on own line

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Instead of a if condition with a line split, use the usual error
handling pattern with a separate variable to improve readability.

No functional changes intended.

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/sh/drivers/pci/common.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/drivers/pci/common.c b/arch/sh/drivers/pci/common.c
index 2fd2b77e12ce..f59e5b9a6a80 100644
--- a/arch/sh/drivers/pci/common.c
+++ b/arch/sh/drivers/pci/common.c
@@ -53,15 +53,16 @@ int __init pci_is_66mhz_capable(struct pci_channel *hose,
 	unsigned short vid;
 	int cap66 = -1;
 	u16 stat;
+	int ret;
 
 	pr_info("PCI: Checking 66MHz capabilities...\n");
 
 	for (pci_devfn = 0; pci_devfn < 0xff; pci_devfn++) {
 		if (PCI_FUNC(pci_devfn))
 			continue;
-		if (early_read_config_word(hose, top_bus, current_bus,
-					   pci_devfn, PCI_VENDOR_ID, &vid) !=
-		    PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL)
+		ret = early_read_config_word(hose, top_bus, current_bus,
+					     pci_devfn, PCI_VENDOR_ID, &vid);
+		if (ret != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL)
 			continue;
 		if (vid == 0xffff)
 			continue;
-- 
2.30.2




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux