Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] locking/arch: Wire up local_try_cmpxchg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 1:33 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 04:17:08PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/local.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/local.h
> > index bc4bd19b7fc2..45492fb5bf22 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/local.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/local.h
> > @@ -90,6 +90,17 @@ static __inline__ long local_cmpxchg(local_t *l, long o, long n)
> >       return t;
> >  }
> >
> > +static __inline__ bool local_try_cmpxchg(local_t *l, long *po, long n)
> > +{
> > +     long o = *po, r;
> > +
> > +     r = local_cmpxchg(l, o, n);
> > +     if (unlikely(r != o))
> > +             *po = r;
> > +
> > +     return likely(r == o);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Why is the ppc one different from the rest? Why can't it use the
> try_cmpxchg_local() fallback and needs to have it open-coded?

Please note that ppc directly defines local_cmpxchg that bypasses
cmpxchg_local/arch_cmpxchg_local machinery. The patch takes the same
approach for local_try_cmpxchg, because fallbacks are using
arch_cmpxchg_local definitions.

PPC should be converted to use arch_cmpxchg_local (to also enable
instrumentation), but this is not the scope of the proposed patchset.

Uros.




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux