Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v1 20/20] mm: rename FOLL_FORCE to FOLL_PTRACE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 03:20:01PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 2:58 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Oh, er, why does get_arg_page() even need FOLL_FORCE? This is writing the
> > new stack contents to the nascent brpm->vma, which was newly allocated
> > with VM_STACK_FLAGS, which an arch can override, but they all appear to include
> > VM_WRITE | VM_MAYWRITE.
> 
> Yeah, it does seem entirely superfluous.
> 
> It's been there since the very beginning (although in that original
> commit b6a2fea39318 it was there as a '1' to the 'force' argument to
> get_user_pages()).
> 
> I *think* it can be just removed. But as long as it exists, it should
> most definitely not be renamed to FOLL_PTRACE.
> 
> There's a slight worry that it currently hides some other setup issue
> that makes it matter, since it's been that way so long, but I can't
> see what it is.

My test system boots happily with it removed. I'll throw it into -next
and see if anything melts...

-- 
Kees Cook



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux