Re: [PATCH v5 06/16] x86/tdx: Make DMA pages shared

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/20/21 10:22 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:

For non TDX case, in CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT, we should still call
amd_force_dma_unencrypted() right?

What I'm saying is that you wouldn't have amd_force_dma_unencrypted(). I think the whole force_dma_unencrypted() can exist as-is in a different file, whether that's cc_platform.c or mem_encrypt_common.c.

It will return true for an SEV or TDX guest, true for an SME host based on the DMA mask or else false. That should work just fine for TDX.

Got it. Thanks for clarifying it.

--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux