On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 6:11 AM Ulrich Teichert
<krypton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 11:35:36AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Naah. I think the Jensen actually had an ISA slot. Came with a
> > > whopping 8MB too, so the ISA DMA should work just fine.
> > >
> > > Or maybe it was EISA only? I really don't remember.
>
> It's EISA only. I've made some pictures of a somewhat dusty inside of
> a Jensen with 4 EISA cards (from bottom to top: SCSI, video, 2x network):
Ok.
Looking around the config options, there _are_ systems with ISA slots,
but it's not the old Jensen one. It's apparently some evaluation
boards but also the "AlphaPC64" one.
So we do want CONFIG_ISA for alpha, even if not Jensen.
(I forget which alpha I had. For some reason I want to think I had an
EISA machine and probably Jensen. Maybe upgraded to a 164 later?)
> I could not get a recent kernel to boot, but it's booting ancient kernels
> just fine:
>
> Linux version 2.4.27-2-generic (tretkowski@bastille) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-12)) #1 Sun May 29 18:40:58 UTC 2005
Ouch. Without having some kind of bisection, I guess we'll never know.
And I assume it's not really been tested since, so it could be
multiple reasons, including compiler updates causing dodgy code to not
work etc etc.
> While we're at it, during my vain attempts to get new kernels to boot,
> I tried to disable PCI support to make the kernels smaller (after all,
> the Jensen has only EISA, so what good would PCI support for?) and
> got it to compile with the attached patch (which fixes some warnings,
> too).
Can you send me your Jensen config?
I do not see why you should be using that horrible __EXERN_INLINE. It
will cause gcc to sometimes not inline at all, and not generate the
out-of-line body either.
Sometimes that is what you want: you want to generate one single body
of the function, and particularly one that is _different_ from the
inlining case (ie for inlining you want to do the simple thing, for
out-of-line you do something fancier).
But that isn't the case here, so this looks like a workaround for
something else. But this code does end up using preprocessor
concatenation etc, so I might be missing some case.
Linus
