On Wednesday, 2021-09-15 23:19 Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok, I didn't love any of the patches I saw for the qnx4 problem, so I > silenced that warning with a new patch of my own. Like the sparc64 > case, the fix is to describe more extensively to the compiler what the > code is actually doing. thanks, looks good to me, too! > Looking at the qnx4 code-base history, I don't think it has gotten any > actual development outside of cleanups in the git history timeframe, > which makes me suspect nobody uses this code. > > But hey, maybe it just works so well for the very specialized user base ... it's actually the latter (although I guess the user base is shrinking) Cheers Anders
