Re: [PATCH 3/4] parisc: Use absolute_pointer for memcmp on fixed memory location

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 9:02 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> -       running_on_qemu = (memcmp(&PAGE0->pad0, "SeaBIOS", 8) == 0);
> +       running_on_qemu = (memcmp(absolute_pointer(&PAGE0->pad0), "SeaBIOS", 8) == 0);

This seems entirely the wrong thing to do, and makes no sense. That
"&PAGE0->pad0" is a perfectly valid pointer, and that's not where the
problem is.

The problem is "PAGE0" itself:

    #define PAGE0   ((struct zeropage *)__PAGE_OFFSET)

which takes that absolute offset and creates a pointer out of it.

IOW, _that_ is what should have the "absolute_pointer()" thing, and in
that context the name of that macro and its use actually makes sense.

No?

An alternative - and possibly cleaner - approach that doesn't need
absolute_pointer() at all might be to just do

        extern struct zeropage PAGE0;

and then make that PAGE0 be defined to __PAGE_OFFSET in the parisc
vmlinux.lds.S file.

Then doing things like

        running_on_qemu = !memcmp(&PAGE0.pad0, "SeaBIOS", 8);

would JustWork(tm).

Hmm?

             Linus



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux