On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:55:40AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Instead of depending on markings in the section following NOTES to
> restore the associated Program Header, use a dummy section, as done
> in other architectures.
This is very laconic and after some staring at ld.info, I think you mean
this:
" If you place a section in one or more segments using ':PHDR', then
the linker will place all subsequent allocatable sections which do not
specify ':PHDR' in the same segments."
but I could be way off. Yes, no?
IOW, please write in the commit messages first what the problem is
you're addressing.
> This is preparation for moving NOTES into the
> RO_DATA macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> index e2feacf921a0..788e78978030 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> @@ -147,8 +147,9 @@ SECTIONS
> } :text = 0x9090
>
> NOTES :text :note
> + .dummy : { *(.dummy) } :text
>
> - EXCEPTION_TABLE(16) :text = 0x9090
> + EXCEPTION_TABLE(16)
This is killing the filler byte but I have a suspicion that'll change
eventually to INT3... :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
