On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 01:07:41PM +0000, Andrew Murray wrote: > Yes I found lots of examples like this across the tree whilst doing this > work. However I decided to initially start with simply removing duplicated > code as a result of adding this flag and attempting to preserve existing > functionality. I thought that if I add missing checks then the patchset > will get much bigger and be harder to merge. I would like to do this though > as another non-cross-arch series. > > Can we limit this patch series to the minimal changes required to fully > use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE and then attempt to fix these existing problems > in subsequent patch sets? Ok, but it would've been nice to see that mentioned somewhere.
