On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:48 PM, George Spelvin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Another few comments:
>
> 1. Would ARCH_HAS_FAST_FFS involve fewer changes than CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS?
No, as you want to _disable_ ARCH_HAS_FAST_FFS / _enable_
CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS as soon as you're enabling support for a
CPU that doesn't support it.
Logical OR is easier in both the Kconfig and C preprocessor languages
than logical NAND.
E.g. in Kconfig, a CPU core not supporting it can just select
CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
