On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:01:05PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> The Alpha Architecture Reference Manual states that any memory access
> performed between an LD_xL and a STx_C instruction may cause the
> store-conditional to fail unconditionally and, as such, `no useful
> program should do this'.
>
> Linux is a useful program, so fix up the Alpha spinlock implementation
> to use logical operations rather than load-address instructions for
> generating immediates.
Huh? Relevant quote is "If any other memory access (ECB, LDx, LDQ_U,
STx_C, STQ_U, WH64x) is executed on the given processor between the
LDx_L and the STx_C, the sequence above may always fail on some
implementations; hence, no no useful programs should do this". Where
do you see LDA in that list and why would it possibly be there? And
no, LDx does *not* cover it - the same reference manual gives
LD{Q,L,WU,BU} as expansion for LDx, using LDAx for LD{A,AH}; it's
a separate group of instructions and it does *NOT* do any kind of
memory access.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
