Hi Roland, sorry for my mistake but with this patch reverted it is not possible to compile the kernel any more. Thanks, Ian --- Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am Fr, 1.10.2010: > Von: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx> > Betreff: Re: [BISECTED] 164UX Regression, 2.6.22->2.6.23 > An: "Ian Las" <ialas@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: "Matt Turner" <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Richard Henderson" <rth@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ivan Kokshaysky" <ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Datum: Freitag, 1. Oktober, 2010 22:37 Uhr > > Hi Roland, > > attached are a working vml2622.gz and a failing > > vml2623.gz images. > > As far as possible identical config has been used for > compilation. > > I was looking for an apples-to-apples comparison, i.e. the > same exact > everything except reverting this one patch. Two > entirely different kernel > source versions is not what I meant at all. But I'll > see if I can tell > what is going on from looking at these. > > > Thanks, > Roland > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
