> Did you end up solving this? ia64 iosapic and parisc iosapic still look > fairly similar... I hit the same issue of ->end() not being called in > the handle_level_irq path and ended up just folding in the missing bit > to ->unmask (we were already EOI the IOSAPIC, but missing the EOI for > the parisc cpu.) Kyle, Yes. Take a look in today's linux-next kernel (tag next-20100929) for commit: 5d4bff94f9e0877a85b4dc573eb7a3f1d97c13ae Essentially I just added an "unmask_irq()" call into the ->end routine, renamed it, and used it as ->unmask. It seems to work okay - I tried migrating interrupts around by poking at /proc/irq/NNN/smp_affinity - and that still works. -Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
