Re: [PATCH 1/2] alpha: use .data.init_task instead of .data.init_thread.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Richard Henderson wrote:

> On 07/31/2009 01:56 PM, Tim Abbott wrote:
> > -	/* Note 2 page alignment above.  */
> > -	.data.init_thread : {
> > -		*(.data.init_thread)
> > -	}
> 
> NACK.
> 
> You can change the section name, sure, but you cannot remove the 2 page
> alignment that we had via the alignment at the end of the init sections.
> You'll break current_thread_info which is always computed as
> (kernel-stack-pointer & -(2*PAGE_SIZE)).

The INIT_TASK_DATA(THREAD_SIZE) macro call aligns to THREAD_SIZE (= 
2*PAGE_SIZE).  So I'm not removing the 2 page alignment; I'm just moving 
it along with the code that needs to be aligned.

This change:

-	. = ALIGN(2 * PAGE_SIZE);
+	. = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
 	__init_end = .;

removes the now-unnecessary (2 * PAGE_SIZE) alignment for __init_end 
caused by moving .data.init_task (it should have been in the first patch).

	-Tim Abbott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux