Rene Herman wrote: > Okay, thought I'd stare at this thing a bit -- there's no specific 1888 > documentation available it seems but I did notice something in the 1878 > datasheet which might mean something. The docs says that bits 0-1 are don't > care for DMA but don't for IRQ, so could it possibly be as simple as the > attached? > > 1878 sheet doesn't document register 0x7f, it seems... > > Assuming it's not just this, this thing is going to require quite a bit of > trial and error and without the hardware this will be troublesome. I expect > this is not it, since the arch init code also doesn't care about bit 0 when > setting that same register for IRQ 5. > > If this is not it -- I'd try s/0x50/0x10/ in that line, even completely > commenting out the IRQ setting line (with the arch code built in) and just > generally frolic around 'till something blows up... > > (es18xx_trial_and_error) As distributed, no change: still not seeing any activity on IRQ 5. I'll play around with it some over the next day or so. Observed: the alsa "snd-sb8" driver works fine. Question: how does IRQ setup differ between the sb8 and the es18xx drivers? If I can find some time, I'll try to figure that out... -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bob Tracy | "I was a beta tester for dirt. They never did rct@xxxxxxxx | get all the bugs out." - Steve McGrew on /. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
