Re: tar vs dump

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, August 15, 2006 19:05, jassduec@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Which is more reliable and better for taking full and incremental
> backups tar or dump. I like dump more but came across some articles on
> the redhat website with references to emails from Linus which state
> that dump should not be used for backup on a linux system.
>
> Are there some free backup tools on linux which can take fast and
> reliable full and incremental backups? I have been doing backup on
> Solaris for years now and never had any issue with ufsdump, ufsrestore
> and snapshots. Is it possible to get similar reliability on linux.

I use BRU, it's not free but it's not expensive either.  It's very
reliable, and does what you are asking.  Nothing wrong with tar though.

--
Scott

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-admin" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Newbie]     [Audio]     [Hams]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Util Linux NG]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Device Drivers]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Git]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux