Re: SSL Certificate signing problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Problem solved. I have written a looong script ;)


On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 10:55:52 +0300, Adrian C. <drupix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One more thing, if i try a load-balancing with ip route will it know
> to failover if one of the routes fails?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 21:07:19 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings
> <cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Adrian C. wrote:
> > > If i assign metric 1 to 1st gway and 2 to 2nd it never falls back from
> > > gateway with best metric. Even if it goes down it still sticks to it.
> > > Something is terribly wrong. I am running Slackware 10.
> >
> > I just went back and re-read what "Unix Networking" and "Linux Network
> > Administrator's Guide" have to say about Metrics and I'm wrong.
> > They apply to Routing daemons (like RIP and gated) and help pick the
> > "fastest" gateways (apparently, the metric is supposed to indicate a
> > number of "hops" from here to there....)
> >
> > However, what if, you create a process which does nothing else but check
> > the status of interface 1.  Set up a default route through interface 1
> > with a default metric (of say "2").  When the interface goes down, have
> > the process "bring up" the second route by adding it to the routing
> > table with a metric of "1".  Now the second interface is the "cheapest".
> >   Your process should now continue to monitor the state of interface 1,
> > and when it comes back up, you  need to figure out how to "dismantle"
> > the second interface.  It could be just as simple as swaping the metrics
> > so that interface 1 is now the "fastest" route.
> >
> > Like I said before, I'm not a networking expert, and I don't understand
> > all the dependancies of already open connections over the various
> > routes, but it seems like a pretty simple way to do things.  OTOH, isn't
> > this essentially what RIP and gated would do for you?  Inotice that
> > Fedora Core 2 has a "routed" package.  Perhaps that has replaced
> > RIP/gated in todays world (my documentation is 10-14 years old)?
> >
> > Disclaimer:  I don't use RIP or gated (anymore) I have a single default
> > interface (cable modem).  The last I tried to use RIP/gated, I was on a
> > corperate network over a 9600 baud modem, and the "RIP storms"
> > eventually consumed the entire bandwidth of the modem rendering the
> > connection unusable.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kevin J. Cummings
> > kjchome@xxxxxxx
> > cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-admin" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Newbie]     [Audio]     [Hams]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Util Linux NG]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Device Drivers]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Git]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux