Re: Cryptoloop and kernel 2.6?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-admin-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> what about crypto loops created within 2.4?
> Is it possible something changed and 2.6 cannot read the old
> ones?

sigh, so much is possible these days...

do you experience any problems with your crypto loops created with a
2.4 kernel under a brand new 2.6? do you use crypto loops in the
first place? if so, why don't you just find out and tell us? :)

 
- -- 
Bastard Administrator in $hell
GPG-Key at http://lists.notified.de/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFABTXFLMyTO8Kj/uQRAllfAJ9ri0sLJOoqafuNDaeNYs5zZwiPQgCeNghR
Yl7Un7FSEwLX10EyyxMSQ14=
=KW3O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-admin" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Newbie]     [Audio]     [Hams]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Util Linux NG]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Device Drivers]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Git]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux