On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 09:34:18AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-09-16 08:45:40)
> > Since the helper "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" is shared between factor
> > and composite clocks, using the factor clk specific helper function
> > like "hw_to_owl_factor" to access its members will create issues when
> > called from composite clk specific code. Hence, pass the "factor_hw"
> > struct pointer directly instead of fetching it using factor clk specific
> > helpers.
> >
> > This issue has been observed when a composite clock like "sd0_clk" tried
> > to call "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" resulting in pointer dereferencing
> > error.
> >
> > While we are at it, let's rename the "clk_val_best" function to
> > "owl_clk_val_best" since this is an owl SoCs specific helper.
> >
> > Fixes: 4bb78fc9744a ("clk: actions: Add factor clock support")
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> I can apply this to clk-next?
Yes, please :-) Rest can go through Ulf's tree.
Thanks,
Mani
>
_______________________________________________
linux-actions mailing list
linux-actions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-actions
