On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:02 PM Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:55:57AM +0000, Russell King wrote: > > The actions SMP implementation has several issues: > > > > 1. pen_release is only ever read and compared to -1, and is defined in > > arch/arm/kernel/smp.c to be -1. This test will always succeed. > > > > 2. we are already guaranteed to be single threaded while bringing up a > > CPU, so the spinlock makes no sense, remove it. > > > > 3. owl_secondary_startup() is not referenced nor defined, the prototype > > is redundant, remove it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi Russel, > > Is this patch a superset of https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg694546.html? Please apply Russell's patch first, I can easily apply my refactorings on top later. Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ linux-actions mailing list linux-actions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-actions
