On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:04:47AM +0100, Parthiban Nallathambi wrote:
> Add S700 to the list of devices supported by Owl I2C driver.
>
> Add Actions Semiconductor Owl family S700 I2C driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Parthiban Nallathambi <pn at denx.de>
> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam at linaro.org>
Rob, is this okay or should we drop this patch and update the DT to
contain first the s700 compatible and then s900 as fallback?
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c
> index 96b4572e6d9c..b6b5a495118b 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c
> @@ -475,6 +475,7 @@ static int owl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id owl_i2c_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "actions,s700-i2c" },
> { .compatible = "actions,s900-i2c" },
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
> --
> 2.17.2
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-actions/attachments/20181211/94ed21df/attachment.sig>
