Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-scmi: Drop unused ACPI_MODULE_NAME definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:47:10PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 7:29 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition is only used by the message
> > printing macros from ACPICA that are not used by the code in
> > question, so it is redundant.  Drop it.
> >
> > No functional impact.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> If there are no concerns regarding this, I'll queue it up for 5.13 in
> the ACPI tree, thanks!

I'd prefer the I2C tree a tad to avoid conflicts. Any reason for the
ACPI tree?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux