On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 08:42:36PM +0530, Calvin Johnson wrote:
> +int fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy(struct mii_bus *bus,
> + struct fwnode_handle *child, u32 addr)
> +{
> + struct mii_timestamper *mii_ts;
If you initialise this to NULL...
> + struct phy_device *phy;
> + bool is_c45 = false;
> + u32 phy_id;
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (is_of_node(child)) {
> + mii_ts = of_find_mii_timestamper(to_of_node(child));
> + if (IS_ERR(mii_ts))
> + return PTR_ERR(mii_ts);
> + }
> +
> + rc = fwnode_property_match_string(child, "compatible", "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45");
> + if (rc >= 0)
> + is_c45 = true;
> +
> + if (is_c45 || fwnode_get_phy_id(child, &phy_id))
> + phy = get_phy_device(bus, addr, is_c45);
> + else
> + phy = phy_device_create(bus, addr, phy_id, 0, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> + if (mii_ts && is_of_node(child))
Then you don't need is_of_node() here.
> + /* phy->mii_ts may already be defined by the PHY driver. A
> + * mii_timestamper probed via the device tree will still have
> + * precedence.
> + */
> + if (mii_ts)
> + phy->mii_ts = mii_ts;
Should this be moved out of the if() case?
I'm thinking of the future where we may end up adding mii timestamper
support for ACPI.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
