Hi Rafael,
On 2021/2/3 2:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Replace the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances
in ac.c with acpi_handle_debug() and acpi_handle_info() calls,
respectively, which among other things causes the excessive log
level of the messages previously printed via ACPI_EXCEPTION() to
be more adequate.
Drop the _COMPONENT and ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definitions that are not
used any more, drop the no longer needed ACPI_AC_COMPONENT definition
from the headers and update the documentation accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v1 -> v2: Changelog update
---
Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst | 1 -
drivers/acpi/ac.c | 12 +++++-------
drivers/acpi/sysfs.c | 1 -
include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h | 1 -
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst
+++ linux-pm/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst
@@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ shows the supported mask values, current
ACPI_CA_DISASSEMBLER 0x00000800
ACPI_COMPILER 0x00001000
ACPI_TOOLS 0x00002000
- ACPI_AC_COMPONENT 0x00020000
ACPI_BATTERY_COMPONENT 0x00040000
ACPI_BUTTON_COMPONENT 0x00080000
ACPI_SBS_COMPONENT 0x00100000
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ac.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/ac.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ac.c
In this file, printk() is still using, how about convert them
all into pr_*? I think patch on top your or update this patch
are both OK.
Thanks
Hanjun
